检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨剑[1] 田钰[1] 张其红[1] 陈杰 Yang Jian;Tian Yu;Zhang Qihong;Chen Jie(Emergency Center,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学中南医院急救中心,湖北武汉430071 [2]美国康涅狄格大学护理学院
出 处:《护理学杂志》2019年第12期65-68,共4页Journal of Nursing Science
摘 要:目的提高急诊科护士护理科研培训效果。方法对急诊科45名临床护士开展为期1年的分层-团队-导师式科研培训,包括分层理论培训、定期读书报告交流、团队项目设计及实施、老师全程指导;与常规培训方法比较培训效果及护士满意度。结果与常规培训方法比较,护士科研能力自评得分及对培训的满意度显著提高(均P<0.01),发表论文数、科研课题及新技术、学术大会交流人次相应增加。结论分层-团队-导师培训法有利于提高科研培训效果,从而护高护士培训满意度。Objective To improve the effect of scientific research training program for emergency nurses. Methods Forty-five emergency nurses received a one-year hierarchical, team and tutor based training program on scientific research, including providing theoretical training according to nurses′ ranks, sharing book reading experience and views, designing and implementing team-based research project. Tutors provided instructions during the whole training. Teaching effect and nurses′satisfaction were compared before (using conventional training methods) and after the intervention. Results After the training, nurses had higher self-evaluation of scientific research ability and satisfaction with the training ( P <0.01 for both). Nurses had more published papers, scientific research projects and new technologies, and more nurses attended academic conferences for presentation. Conclusion Hierarchical, team and tutor based training contributes to improving teaching effect and nurses′ satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117