检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨辉 陈天兵 朱小龙 石玮 李雪琴[1,2] YANG Hui;CHEN Tianbing;ZHU Xiaolong;SHI Wei;LI Xueqin(Department of Evidence-based Medicine, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241001, China)
机构地区:[1]皖南医学院循证医学教研室,安徽芜湖241002 [2]皖南医学院第一附属医院弋矶山医院中心实验室,安徽芜湖241001 [3]皖南医学院公共卫生学院,安徽芜湖241002
出 处:《皖南医学院学报》2019年第4期391-395,共5页Journal of Wannan Medical College
基 金:皖南医学院教学质量与教学改革工程项目(2018jyxm41)
摘 要:目的:构建线上线下相结合的以团队学习为基础的TBL教学模式,探讨其应用效果。方法:选择我校2014级临床医学专业本科生10个班级共289名学生为研究对象,随机分为观察组(n=147)和对照组(n=142)。观察组使用线上线下结合的TBL教学模式,对照组使用传统教学模式,通过课后随堂测试、学生自主学习能力比较两种教学方法的效果。采用自制问卷描述观察学生对TBL教学模式的评价与反馈。结果:观察组学生的课后随堂测试成绩和成绩优良率优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);问卷调查自主学习能力,观察组和对照组在实施前差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组在各项评分、自我管理能力、信息能力、学习合作能力及总分均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组学生认为TBL教学模式在教学内容、组织新式、教学效果和考核方式上新颖独特,尤其是在提高师生间与学生间的互动合作能力上有较好的效果。结论:TBL教学模式有效提升了学生的学习成绩和学习主观能动性,对教学质量的提高有着较为积极的影响。Objective:To assess the effects of team-based learning(TBL) mode in instruction of the discipline of evidence-based medicine. Methods:A total of 289 undergraduates from 10 classes, majoring in clinical medicine, enrolled in 2014 in our college, were included and randomized into observational group(n=147) and control group(n=142). The experimental group was instructed with TBL based on on-line learning and classroom teaching, whereas the control group was taught by conventional lecture-based learning(LBL). At the end of the course,ability of self-study and effects of the two teaching methods were evaluated by in-class quiz,and self-programmed questionnaires were used to collect the subjective evaluation and feedback of students towards TBL. Results: Students in the observational group had higher scoring by in-class quiz in general and good-to-excellence rate than those in the control group(P<0.05). Questionnaire survey indicated no difference between groups in self-learning ability before teaching(P>0.05),yet students in the observational group were better than those in the control group regarding the component scores,self-management ability,ability to collect information and of team-cooperation as well as total scores in the in-class quiz(P<0.05). Besides,students in the observational group commented that TBL were better in teaching contents,class organization,teaching effects and academic assessment,particularly in improvement of the interaction of students with teachers. Conclusion: TBL could effectively upgrade the academic scores of students and improve the incentive of students in learning as well as produce positive effects on the teaching quality.
分 类 号:G642.4[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222