思想分析对心理分析的超越——以克尔凯郭尔分析“绝望”为例  

On the Ideological Analysis beyond the Psychological Analysis——A Case Study of the “Despair” Analyzed by Kierkegaard

作　　者：罗龙祥[1] LUO Longxiang(College of Social Development, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009)

机构地区：[1]扬州大学社会发展学院

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2019年第4期88-94,110,共8页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：江苏高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目“哲学践行与哲学教育的双向启示”(2017SJB1140);扬州大学教学改革研究课题立项支持项目“苏格拉底方法与哲学实践教学”(YZUJX2017-43C)

摘　　要：在哲学史上,丹麦哲学家克尔凯郭尔关于“绝望”的分析,有明显的心理分析踪迹,但更主要的是一种思想分析,由此也在一定程度上给人一种混淆心理分析和思想分析的错觉。然而,当我们深入理解克尔凯郭尔的分析之后就会发现,克尔凯郭尔的分析是深刻的,并且明显地体现了思想分析对心理分析的超越。所以,认真审视克尔凯郭尔的这种分析,不仅有助于我们澄清思想分析和心理分析的区别,而且更有助于我们认识思想分析的重要性和不可替代性。In the history of philosophy, Kierkegaard, the Danish philosopher, analyzed the despair with a trace of strong psychological analysis. But his analysis is mainly an ideological analysis. Thereby also giving an illusion confused ideological analysis and psychological analysis to a certain extent. However, when we deeply understand his analysis, we will find that his analysis is profound, and it clearly reflects the ideological analysis beyond psychological analysis. After studying his analysis carefully, we can clarify the differences between ideological analysis and psychological analysis. Furthermore, it helps us to understand deeply the importance and irreplaceability of ideological analysis.

关 键 词：思想分析 心理分析 绝望 哲学治疗 

分 类 号：B82[哲学宗教—伦理学]