团队薪酬对团队质量绩效和效率绩效的影响——合作性努力和竞争性努力的中介效应  

Impact of Team-Based Rewards on Quality and Efficiency Performance: The Mediation Effect of Cooperative and Competitive Efforts

作　　者：刘颖 张正堂[2] LIU Ying;ZHANG Zheng-tang

机构地区：[1]南京工程学院经济管理学院 [2]南京大学商学院

出　　处：《华南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第4期120-129,I0003,共11页Journal of South China Normal University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目“中国企业惩罚行为的决策动因、直接及溢出效应”(71372028);南京大学人文社会科学“双一流”建设第三批“百层次”项目“团队薪酬差距对内部合作与团队绩效的影响:多动因的视角”;南京工程学院引进人才基金项目“团队报酬对成员合作与团队创新绩效的作用研究”(YKJ201535)

摘　　要：团队薪酬的优势在于能促进团队协作,但却可能产生抑制成员努力的倾向。目前研究者仍未能解释团队薪酬在何时有效而在何时无效。本研究尝试从团队质量绩效和效率绩效的角度进行解释,并引入了合作性努力和竞争性努力的中介研究。通过调查106个有效团队,发现团队薪酬对团队质量绩效有促进作用,对团队效率绩效有负向影响;合作性努力中介了团队薪酬对质量绩效的作用,竞争性努力中介了团队薪酬对效率绩效的影响;任务互依性对这两个中介都起到增强型调节的作用。对于追求效率的团队,个体激励可能是更好的方式,而对于追求质量的团队,则团队报酬可能是更好的选择。The advantage of team-based rewards is their promotion of team collaboration, but they may have a tendency to suppress the members efforts. Researchers cannot clearly explain the mechanism of action of team rewards until now, so this paper tries to explain it from the perspective of quality performance and efficiency performance, with introducing the mediation effects of cooperative efforts and competitive efforts. By investigating 106 work teams, it is found that team rewards have a positive effect on team quality performance and have a negative effect on team efficiency. Moreover, cooperative efforts mediate the effect of team rewards on quality performance, and competitive efforts mediate the effect of team rewards on efficiency performance. Task interdependence enhances both of the effects. Therefore, individual rewards are beneficial to teams that pursue efficiency, and team rewards are good for teams that pursues quality.

关 键 词：团队薪酬 合作性努力 竞争性努力 团队质量绩效 团队效率绩效 

分 类 号：F272.92[经济管理—企业管理]