检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙午生[1] SUN Wusheng(Department of Scientific Research,Beijing College of Politics and Law,Beijing,102628,China)
机构地区:[1]北京政法职业学院科研处
出 处:《教育文化论坛》2019年第4期94-99,共6页Tribune of Education Culture
摘 要:健全职业教育制度早已成为世界上很多国家和地区提升国际竞争力和发展国家经济的重要抓手,因而职业教育立法获得了充分发展。在职业教育发展和推进社会主义法治化的进程中,我国的职业教育法律体系逐渐形成,但与我国社会经济和职业教育的发展相比,其有明显的滞后性。英国、美国、德国和日本的职业教育立法进程有序,已建立完善的职业教育法律体系,目前看,其职业教育立法体系建设超于我国。在新时代对职业教育发展新的需求前提下,分析英国、美国、德国、日本的职业教育立法特点,以他山之石,探讨完善我国职业教育法律体系的进路,对我职业教育事业发展意义重大。Improving the vocational education system has long been an important way for many countries and regions to enhance their international competitiveness and develop their national economy.And the vocational education legislation has been fully developed in the world.China’s vocational education legal system has gradually formed,but compared with the development of China’s social economy and vocational education,it has obvious lagging behind.The vocational education legislation process in the United Kingdom,the United States,Germany and Japan has been in good order,and a sound vocational education legal system has been established.Their construction of vocational education legal system is superior to China’s.In view of this,this paper compares and analyzes the characteristics of vocational education legislation in the above five countries,and explores the way to improve the legal system of vocational education in China.
分 类 号:G40-011.8[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30