宋代礼学转向的先声:“濮议”与程颐《论濮王典礼疏》  

A Herald of the Turn at the Study of Rites in the Song Dynasty: "Puyi" and Cheng Yi’s On the Rituals of Prince Pu

作　　者：罗超华[1] LUO Chao-hua(School of Liberal Arts, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学文学院

出　　处：《海南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2019年第4期135-142,共8页Journal of Hainan University （Humanities & Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(201806190071)

摘　　要：宋英宗治平年间的"濮议",是围绕濮王称号问题进行的一场礼制之争。以欧阳修、司马光为代表的论争双方,因受两种不同传统礼学思想的影响,故在对"情""礼"的认识及丧服制度的两个核心--"尊尊"与"亲亲"的理解上产生分歧,由此引发了持久的论争。而在此期间,程颐于《论濮王典礼疏》中则以"理"释"礼",提出了兼容"情""礼"的第三种观点,这对融"礼"入"理",由"礼"到"理"的历史转变具有重要意义,可以视为宋代礼学转向的先声。The Puyi debate in the Pingzhi Period of Emperor Yingzong in the Song Dynasty is a controversy of correct rituals over how best to address the Prince of Pu.Affected by two kinds of different thoughts on traditional rites,the two parties represented by Ouyang Xiu and Sima Guang respectively disagreed with each other in terms of understandings of "human feeling" and "rituals" as well as interpretations of "reverence" and "parent" as the core in the system of mourning the deceased,which caused the endless debate.In the meantime,Cheng Yi explained "rituals" by means of "principles" in his On the Rituals of Prince Pu,putting forward the third view that integrates "human feeling" and "rituals".This view is of great significance to the integration of "rituals" into " principles" and the historic transformation from former to the latter,which can be regarded as the herald of the turn at the study of rites in the Song Dynasty.

关 键 词：濮议 礼学 理学 天理人心 

分 类 号：B244.6[哲学宗教—中国哲学]