学术性课程知识结构的社会关系与文化再生产之关联性:再脉络化的机制  

The Relationship between the Social Relation within Academic Curriculum and Cultural Reproduction: The Mechanism of Recontextualization

作　　者：姜添辉 CHIANG Tienhui(Academy of Globalization and Education Policy,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,450001 ,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学教育学院全球化与教育政策研究中心,郑州450001

出　　处：《全球教育展望》2019年第7期32-45,共14页Global Education

摘　　要：文化再生产关注不公平教育结果的产生过程,延续此种路径,本文探索伯因斯坦的再脉络化概念,以剖析文本知识的重组过程与作用。关于此种知识再生产,一些学者认定新自由主义强化政府权威,所以能透过官方再脉络化场域主导教育论述,进而掌控知识再生产。然而,本文指出,这种论点仅说明权力与文本知识重组的关联性,并未探究学科内容的知识结构型态,此种型态是权力的产物,所以知识文本内建特定的结构规则,因此习得此种知识需求特定认识规则。此种关联性彰显出的原则是,影响学习表现并非知识本身,而是知识结构中的社会关系。由此而言,要改善文化再生产的问题,便应弱化权力结构的社会关系。Cultural reproduction focuses on the process of producing the results of unfair education.Following this path,this paper explores Bernstein's re-contextualization concept to analyze the process and function of textual knowledge reorganization.As for the reproduction of such knowledge,some scholars believe that neo-liberalism strengthens the authority of the government,so it can dominate the educational discourse through the official re-venation field,and then control the reproduction of knowledge.However,this paper points out that this argument only illustrates the relevance between power and textual knowledge reorganization,while does not explore the knowledge structure type of subject content,which is the product of power.Thus,knowledge text builds specific structural rules and the acquisition of such knowledge requires specific cognitive rules.This association reflects the principle that learning performance is not affected by knowledge itself,but by social relationships within the knowledge structure.Therefore,to improve cultural reproduction,we should weaken the social relations of power structure.

关 键 词：文化再生产 再脉络化 学术性课程 分类 社会关系 

分 类 号：G423[文化科学—课程与教学论]