检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱汉民[1] Zhu Hanmin
机构地区:[1]湖南大学岳麓书院
出 处:《社会科学》2019年第9期118-126,共9页Journal of Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目“四书学与中国思想传统的重建和整合研究”(项目编号:15 AZD032)的阶段性成果
摘 要:宋儒在建构《四书》学的过程中,以《四书》学去整合国家的意识形态和社会思想。士人思想的道统与君主权力的政统之间,一直存在严重矛盾。儒家士人推动的《四书》思想整合,引发了长久的道统与政统的权力博弈,分别出现了以治统代表道统和以道统批判治统的不同政治文化。《四书》学整合过程中道统与政统博弈,能够帮助我们进一步思考儒家多维价值、多元形态的思想特点。During the process of constructing the Four Books canon,the Song Ruists were attempting to integrate the canon with-and thereby to modify-the ideology of the nationstate and the thought of society at large.There had always been serious conflicts between the thought of the scholar-literati class,who promulgated a succession of the Way,and the power of the aristocratic class,who promulgated a succession of governance.The aforementioned integration of the thought embodied in the Four Books canon which was driven by the Song Ruist scholar-literati sparked off a lengthy power struggle between the succession of the Way and succession of governance traditions,and there was an appearance of two respective political phenomena:the governmental succession tradition attempting itself to supplant the succession of the Way tradition,and the succession of the Way tradition criticising and censuring the governmental succession tradition.This struggle between the two respective traditions during the process of integration of the Four Books canon can provoke us to deeper reflections on the multidimensionality of Ruist values and the characteristic pluralism of Ruist thought.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145