嘉绒藏族的亲属词概念结构——兼同纳西族、摩梭人、彝族、白族比较  

The Conceptual Structure of Kinship Words of Rgyalrong Tibetan

作　　者：李惠娟 张积家[2] LI Hui-juan;ZHANG Ji-jia(School of Educational Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, China;Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

机构地区：[1]河南大学教育科学学院,河南开封475001 [2]中国人民大学心理学系,北京100872

出　　处：《贵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2019年第4期33-41,共9页Journal of Guiyang University:Social Sciences

基　　金：北京市社会科学基金项目:“亲属词空间隐喻表征的效应与机制研究”(项目编号:16YYB024)阶段性成果;国家民委民族研究重点项目:“少数民族学生双语学习认知规律研究”(项目编号:2017-GMA-004)阶段性成果

摘　　要：采用自由分类法探讨嘉绒藏族的亲属词概念结构。结果表明:(1)嘉绒藏族的亲属词概念结构有两个维度:亲属的亲密程度和辈分大小;(2)亲属词被分为两大类四个子类,两大类是近亲和非近亲,四个子类是近亲属、非近亲长辈、非近亲晚辈和同辈姻亲。嘉绒藏族的亲属词概念结构与同源民族既存在相似,也存在差异。整个研究表明,嘉绒藏族的亲属词概念结构既受家庭结构、婚姻制度、居住环境和生活方式影响,也受语言、文化和宗教影响。By using the method of natural classifying, this paper probes into the conceptual structure of kinship words of Rgyalrong Tibetan. The results show that there are two main dimensions in the conceptual structure of kinship words of Rgyalrong Tibetan: the level of intimacy among the relatives and the seniority in the family. What’s more, the kinship words of Rgyalrong Tibetan can be divided into four subclasses: close kinsfolk, elder non-close kinsfolk, low generation non- close kinsfolk, and same generation non-close kinsfolk in-laws. The conceptual structure of kinship words of Rgyalrong Tibetan is similar to that of the same ethnic group, but also different. The whole study shows that the conceptual structure of kinship terms of Rgyalrong Tibetan is influenced not only by family structure, marriage system, living environment and lifestyle, but also by language, culture and religion.

关 键 词：藏族 亲属词 概念结构 

分 类 号：H0-05[语言文字—语言学] B84-05[哲学宗教—基础心理学]