检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾晓燕 陈晓湘 ZENG Xiao-yan;CHEN Xiao-xiang(College of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)
机构地区:[1]湖南大学外国语学院
出 处:《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》2019年第5期95-101,共7页Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
基 金:湖南省学位与研究生教育课题:后现代背景下英语硕士生培育创新实践研究(JG2013A010);湖南省社科基金外语联合项目:第二语言句法语义加工的认知研究(17WLH09);湖南省教改课题:体验哲学视角下的大学英语读写教学的实证研究
摘 要:依据情状体假说,考察了语体(口语/书面语)、动词情状及英语水平对中国学习者英语进行体习得的影响。基于口语和书面语语料库,该文分析了两组不同水平的中国大学生英语进行体的使用情况。结果表明:两组水平的学习者在口语中使用英语进行体频率均高于书面语;动词情状体在进行体中的总体分布不受语体和学习者英语水平影响,支持情状体假说的第三点预测;状态动词用于进行体与学习者英语水平有关,不支持情状体假说第四点预测。From the perspective of the Aspect Hypothesis, this paper investigated the effect of modality (spoken vs.written), lexical aspect of verbs and English proficiency levels on Chinese learners’ use of the English progressive aspect. Based on a spoken corpus and a written corpus, it analyzed the English progressive aspect produced by Chinese university students with two proficiency levels. The findings show that for learners with both proficiency levels, the frequency of using the English progressive aspect is higher in spoken corpus than that in written corpus;irrespective of mode of production and L2 language proficiency levels, Chinese learners’ use of the English progressive aspect is influenced by lexical aspect of verbs, which supports the third prediction of the Aspect Hypothesis. The use of stative verbs is related to learners’ proficiency level, which does not support the fourth prediction of the Aspect Hypothesis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.181