检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晨[1] 王书鹏[1] 王慧[1] 马军宇[1] 吴筱箐 李雯[1] 段军[1] Li Chen;Wang Shupeng;Wang Hui;Ma Junyu;Wu Xiaoqing;Li Wen;Duan Jun(Surgery Intensive Care Unit, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China)
机构地区:[1]中日友好医院外科重症医学科,北京100029
出 处:《中华医学教育杂志》2019年第9期673-676,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Education
摘 要:目的探讨重症超声模拟教学方法在重症医学教学中的应用效果。方法选取中日友好医院2016年7月~2018年6月重症医学专业的80名进修医师作为研究对象,将其平均分为实验组与对照组,每组40名学员。实验组采用模拟教学方法,对照组使用传统教学方法。比较两组学员的理论考核和操作考核成绩。结果实验组学员的理论考核成绩[(45.25±2.45)分比(32.15±4.90)分]和操作考核成绩[(36.30±2.89)分比(26.85±2.66)分]均高于对照组学员,其差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。结论重症超声模拟教学在重症医学教学中的表现出了良好的教学效果。Objective To explore the application of critical care ultrasound simulation teaching in critical care medicine. Methods A total of eighty trainees from July 2016 to June 2018 in China-Japan Friendship Hospital were selected into two groups equally. Forty trainees were included in the traditional teaching group and taughtwith the classic teaching mode. Another forty trainees were included in the simulation teaching group with the simulation teaching mode. The theoretical examination and operational examination results of the two groups were compared. Results The theoretical and operational assessment scores of the simulated teaching group were higher than those of the traditional teaching group with statistically significance (45.25±2.45 vs 32.15±4.90, 36.30±2.89 vs 26.85±2.66, all P<0.01). Conclusions The effect of simulated teaching of critical care ultrasound in the teaching of critical medicine is obviously better than that of traditional teaching methods.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.42.179