三二分段生与普通高考生课程学习能力比较研究——以机械制造与自动化专业为例  

Comparative Study on Learning Ability Between Students from “3+2” Scheme and Students through the Ordinary College Entrance Examination——Taking Students in Mechanical Manufacturing and Automation as an Example

作　　者：肖霞[1] 谷茂[2] XIAO Xia;GU Mao(Vocational Education Research Department,Dongguan Polytechnic,Dongguan,Guangdong 523808;Shenzhen Polytechnic,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518055,China)

机构地区：[1]东莞职业技术学院职教研究中心,广东东莞523808 [2]深圳职业技术学院,广东深圳518055

出　　处：《深圳职业技术学院学报》2019年第5期58-62,共5页Journal of Shenzhen Polytechnic

基　　金：广东省高等职业教育教学改革立项项目“高职院校‘课证融合’教学管理的研究与实践”(20130303001);东莞职业技术学院重大招标教改项目(JGZB201802);东莞职业技术学院创新强校项目“东莞区域职业院校联盟”阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：通过对三二分段生与普高生高职学段的课程学习能力比较,明确了两类学生的差异:只有50%的三二分段生适应高职段学习,三二分段班后50%的学生在高职学段的课程学习能力显著低于普高班学生.据此提出3点建议:制定三二分段生的转段录取标准时,应把握50%的转段录取原则;高职院校应打破现有分班学习机制,建立灵活的学习班组织形式;应重构三二分段生中职学段的课程教学体系,加强文化课教育.This paper compares the learning ability of the "3+2" scheme students with the students through the ordinary college entrance examination, and clarifies some difference between them: only 50% of "3+2" scheme students could adapt to the higher vocational education. The learning ability of the middle-level students of the "3+2" scheme is equivalent to the low-level students who entered through the ordinary college entrance examination. Therefore, three suggestions are proposed: when formulating the admission criteria for the "3+2" scheme students, the principle of 50% should be held;the existing class organization should be broken and reorganized;the curriculum structure in the first part of "3+2" scheme should be reconstructed, and cultural education should be strengthened.

关 键 词：三二分段生 课程学习能力 比较研究 

分 类 号：G712[文化科学—职业技术教育学] TG659-4[文化科学—教育学]