检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:惠瑜 董雅清 HUI Yu;DONG Ya-qing(Graduate School, Xi'an International Studies University,Xi'an,Shaanxi 710128,China;Xingzhi College,Xi'an University of Finance and Economics,Xi'an,Shaanxi 710038,China)
机构地区:[1]西安外国语大学研究生院,陕西西安710128 [2]西安财经大学行知学院,陕西西安710038
出 处:《教学研究》2019年第5期47-55,共9页Research in Teaching
基 金:国家留学基金委2017年建设高水平大学联合培养博士研究生项目(201708610149);陕西省教育厅2016年度科学研究计划项目(16JK2057)
摘 要:已有对英语考试的研究多集中在题目设置、考试组织等宏观层次,鲜有对其语料展开专门的语言分析。针对自建的两个各包含16篇大学英语六级和雅思听力考试长篇对话的小型语料库,比较了两类考试的听力语篇在语境和词汇结构方面的差别。基于系统功能语法的人际功能框架,从主语、语气、情态、辅句和评价语五个方面对语料进行了语篇分析,结果发现,六级和雅思在词汇、主语、语气和辅句方面均存在较大差别。并依据一项445名英语学习者参与的网上问卷调查,分析了他们的听力语料来源及其和英语水平的关系。最后,结合研究结果,对英语听力教学提出了几点启示。Previous studies have investigated English tests at a macro level such as exam design, organization and so forth. Few researchers however analyzed the language use in tests from the perspective of linguistic analysis. This study built 2 small corpora composed of 16 long conversations from CET 6 and IELTS listening tests respectively. Differences in context and lexical structure between CET and IELTS were firstly investigated. Discourse analysis of two corpora in terms of their subject, mood, modality, minor clause and appraising items was then conducted from the perspective of interpersonal function of Systemic Functional Grammar. Variation between CET and IELTS were finally found in vocabulary, subject, mood and minor clause. The study also reported an online survey with 445 participants of English learners, discussing the source of their listening materials and the relationship between their English proficiency and listening materials. Finally, implications on teaching and learning of English listening were provided.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7