检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘艳[1] 倪传斌[2] LIU Yan;NI Chuanbin
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学语言科技研究所,江苏南京210046 [2]南京师范大学外国语学院,江苏南京210097
出 处:《外语与外语教学》2019年第4期57-67,147,148,共13页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“外语磨蚀的回归性分析”(项目编号:10BYY027);江苏省社会科学基金项目“江苏省大学生英语书面语水平磨蚀调研及后续配套慕课建设”(项目编号:16YYD005)的部分研究成果;江苏高校“青蓝工程”资助
摘 要:在句法磨蚀领域,国内外研究主要聚焦于接受性句法技能,迄今鲜有学者对产出性句法的受蚀状况进行实证探索。本研究基于英语二语学习者的疑问句习得顺序,借助翻译和语法判断任务,探讨中国英语学习者产出性和接受性疑问句的受蚀状况。结果显示:1)学习者产出性和接受性英语疑问句的受蚀顺序均与其习得顺序相反,呈现回归性特征;2)英语产出性疑问句受蚀程度显著高于接受性,这表明回归性亦存在于语言技能间;3)标记度高、使用频率低、激活阈值高、结构和认知复杂的产出性英语句法最易受蚀。据此,教师在教学中应增加对以上易蚀句法的刺激和提取频率;相关部门在制定语言政策时,需提高和优化口语、翻译及写作等产出性任务的教学要求和评价体系,以帮助学习者保持现有的外语能力。In the field of syntactic attrition,foreign and domestic research has focused dominantly on receptive syntactic skills,and few empirical studies have been conducted to probe the attrition of productive syntactic structures so far.This study,on the basis of EFL learners'acquisition se-quence in terms of English interrogative structures,is designed to investigate the attrition of Chi-nese adult EFL learners'receptive and productive English interrogative structures by way of translation and grammaticality judgment.The results revealed that:1)EFL learners'attrition sequence of English interrogative structures,either receptive or productive ones,roughly reflected the inversed pattern of their acquisition sequence,which echoed Regression Hypothesis;2)the at-trition rate of productive English interrogative structures was significantly higher than that of re-ceptive ones,suggesting that Regression was also manifested cross linguistic skills;3)the syntac-tic items most vulnerable to attrition were generally characterized by a high activation threshold,a low frequency of use,high-ranking markedness as well as great complexity in structures and cognitive demands.Accordingly,these syntactic items should be activated and retrieved more fre-quently in language teaching.In addition,in developing language policy,decision-makers should make more efforts to improve teaching requirements and optimize evaluation systems of such productive tasks as speaking,translating and writing,to help students maintain the competence acquired.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.48.156