尼采对西方人权及自然法的批判  

Nietzsche's Critique on Western Human Right and Natural Law Theories

作　　者：明辉[1] 李霞[2] Ming Hui;Li Xia

机构地区：[1]北京航空航天大学法学院,北京100191 [2]中国社会科学院法学研究所,北京100720

出　　处：《复印报刊资料（法理学、法史学）》2018年第10期65-74,共10页JURISPRUDENCE AND HISTORY OF LAW

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目“现代西方法理学研究”(11JHQ016);北京市社会科学基金重大项目“中国法治三重因素的冲突与融合”(15ZDA01)。

摘　　要：在德国法哲学思想研究中,尼采因否认人类基本权利的存在,而被视为法律虚无主义者,甚至与法西斯主义密切相关。然而,误解与中伤丝毫没有妨碍尼采对后现代主义思潮与非基础性法律研究进路的影响。尼采虽然很少关注,甚至仅以碎片化的方式论及法律问题,但通过从其相关哲学问题的探讨中获得的智识线索,例如尼采从语言学、谱系学的视角分析和批判西方人权与自然法理论,可以从中归纳出一些尼采关于法律问题的哲学观念,进而整合出一种尼采式的非基础性的、试验性的法哲学。In the study of Germanic legal philosophy,Nietzsche was regarded as a legal nihilist,even closely related to fascism,because of his denying the existence of fundamental human rights.However,misconceiving and slandering had done nothing to Nietzsche's influence on postmodernism and non-basic approaches of legal research.Nietzsche seldom focused on,even discussed in fragments,legal issues,but through those intellectual clues appeared in his discussions of philosophical issues related to law,such as NietzSche^s analyzing and criticizing the Western human rights and natural law theories in views of linguistics and genealogy,we maybe find some Nietzsche's philosophical ideas about legal issues,thus integrate one kind of Nietzschean non-basic and experimental legal philosophy.

关 键 词：尼采 人权 自然法 批判性 

分 类 号：B51[哲学宗教—外国哲学]