因明与《墨辩》研究  

Analysis on Mohist Canons from the Perspective of Hetuvidya

作　　者：曾昭式[1] ZENG Zhao-shi(The Institute of Logic and Cognition,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学逻辑与认知研究所/哲学系

出　　处：《兰州大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第3期47-53,共7页Journal of Lanzhou University（Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“基于跨文化互动下的中国近现代汉传因明研究”（14BZX074）

摘　　要：新文化运动以来,《墨辩》研究有用西方学术为依据而成就的“新墨辩”,如《墨辩》的科学思想、《墨辩》的逻辑学等;也有欲建立一个“逻辑”学科,基于此学科比较西方逻辑、中国逻辑、佛教逻辑之同异,如虞愚基于“论理学”学科下的因明、中国名学、逻辑比较研究;还有不少学者用因明理论解释《墨辩》,如张纯一的著作《墨子集释》中的《墨辩》研究、谭戒甫的著作《墨辩发微》等。从张纯一、谭戒甫的《墨辩》研究看,就因明而言,具有整体性,是与唯识学连为一体的;就《墨辩》的因明研究而言,是碎片化的,是剪裁“百科全书”《墨辩》的因明内容。A new school in the study of Mohist Canons,based on Western scholarship,has taken shape since the New Culture Movement.Some scholars concentrate on the scientific thought in it,some explore the logic in it,and some focus on establishing a discipline of Logic to compare western logic with Chinese and Buddhist logic,e.g.,Yu Yu’s comparative study on the difference and similarities among Hetuvidya,ancient Chinese school of naming and logic on the basis of Logic Study.Others use the theory of Hetuvidya to explain Mohist Canons,e.g.,Zhang Chunyi’s study on Mohist Canons in his Collected Annotations of Mozi,and Tan Jiefu’s Analysis on Mohist Canons.From Zhang and Tan’s studies,it can be concluded that studies upon Hetuvidya take an overall approach and are tightly connected with the theory of Consciousness-only,while studies on Hetuvidya in Mohist Debate are fragmentized and extracted from encyclopedic introductions to previous Hetuvidya studies.

关 键 词：《墨辩》 因明 唯识学 张纯一 谭戒甫 

分 类 号：B224[哲学宗教—中国哲学] B81-09