三个概念、两处“竞合”、两项“冲突”——认罪认罚从宽之法解释学评析  

THREE CONCEPTS, TWO CONCURRENCES AND TWO CONFLICTS: COMMENTS ON PLEADING GUILTY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL HERMENEUTICS

作　　者：刘文轩 LIU Wenxuan(School of Law,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院

出　　处：《河南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第5期24-30,共7页Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：准确认识和把握“认罪认罚从宽”之内涵是适用该制度的基础和前提。“认罪”是指被追诉人自愿供述或承认其基本的犯罪事实;“认罚”是指被追诉人同意量刑建议并积极退赃退赔;“从宽”包含量刑上“优惠”和程序上从缓两个方面。“认罪认罚”虽与“坦白自首”“刑事和解”存在逻辑交叉与概念竞合,但实则是一种独立的量刑情节。累犯同样适用认罪认罚从宽制度。“拒不认罪”不应较之于“认罪认罚”一味从重处罚。To understand and grasp the connotation of pleading guilty is the basis and premise of applying the system.Guilty plea refers to the voluntary confession or admission of the criminal facts by the accused.Punishment acceptance means that the accused accepts the sentencing proposal,and returns ill-gotten gains or compensates actively.Leniency includes two aspects,namely,sentencing and procedural leniency.Though there is a logical intersection and a conceptual concurrence among the leniency system,voluntary surrender and criminal reconciliation,the leniency system is an independent sentencing circumstance.Such a leniency system also applied to recidivists.And refusal to plead guilty should not be given a heavier punishment.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽 自首坦白 刑事和解 累犯加重 拒不认罪 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]