检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘存华 莫宗赵 周莹[1] LIU Cunhua;Mo Zongzhao;ZHOU Ying(Guangxi Normal University,Guilin,Guangxi 541004,China)
机构地区:[1]广西师范大学
出 处:《现代教育科学》2019年第11期145-150,共6页Modern Education Science
基 金:广西壮族自治区研究生教育创新计划项目“基于NVIVO编码影响的民族地区初中数学逆商的归因分析”(项目编号:XYCSZ2019084)
摘 要:近年来,逆商(逆境商)受到国内外学者的广泛关注,而关于逆商教育的研究更是成为热点问题。为分析我国学生逆商研究的现状及未来趋势,以中国知网收录的179篇有关学生逆商的期刊论文和硕博士学位论文为研究样本,从年度分布、研究对象、研究主题3个主维度进行统计分析。研究发现,现有研究虽然取得一定的成果,也存在不足:研究对象亟需均衡化、内涵理论亟待本土化、测评工具有待自主化、研究方向尚需学科化。由此提出几点思考:重视中小学阶段逆商的研究、加强理论的优化和改良、开发适合实际情况的量表、注重学科逆商的探索。In recent years,Adversity Quotient has been widely concerned by scholars at home and abroad,and the study on Adversity Quotient education has become a hot topic.In order to analyze the current situation and future trend of Chinese students'Adversity Quotient research,179 journal papers and master and doctoral dissertations on students’Adversity Quotient collected by CNKI were taken as research samples to conduct statistical analysis from three major dimensions,including annual distribution,research object and research topic.The study found that although China's research on students’Adversity Quotient has achieved certain results,there are still some shortcomings:the research object needs to be“balanced”,the connotation theory needs to be“localized”,the evaluation tools need to be“independent”,and the research direction needs to be“subject oriented”.Some thoughts are put forward as follows:attaching importance to the study of Adversity Quotient in primary and secondary schools,strengthening the optimization and improvement of theories,developing scales suitable for the actual situation,and paying attention to the exploration of disciplinary Adversity Quotient.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3