检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邹惠安 李琳芸 唐元艳[1] 陈永玲 梅冰[1] ZOU Huian;LI Linyun;TANG Yuanyan;CHEN Yongling;MEI Bing(Sec?ond Clinical Medical College of Yangtze University,Jingzhou 434020,China)
机构地区:[1]长江大学第二临床医学院,湖北 荆州 434020
出 处:《实用医学杂志》2019年第21期3374-3377,3383,共5页The Journal of Practical Medicine
基 金:湖北省卫生健康委科研项目(编号:WJ2019F125)
摘 要:目的探讨急性髓系白血病免疫分子与PML/RARα融合基因之间的关系及免疫分子对PML/RARα融合基因表达的诊断效能。方法选取荆州市中心医院2016年7月至2019年2月初诊FAB分型为急性髓系白血病的患者120例,荧光定量PCR检测融合基因PML/RARα,流式细胞术检测CD分子表达,根据融合基因PML/RARα是否表达对患者进行分组,分析免疫分型CD分子表达差异及与融合基因PML/RARα表达的关联。结果PML/RARα阳性患者组CD64阳性患者率高达75.0%,CD34、HLA?DR、CD7阳性患者率分别为7.7%、7.7%、0;PML/RARα阴性患者组CD64阳性患者率为28.6%,CD7、CD34、HLA?DR阳性患者率分别为44.4%、77.8%、63.0%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PML/RARα阳性患者中CD64阳性细胞率四分位数均高于PML/RARα阴性患者,CD7、CD34、HLA?DR阳性细胞率四分位数均低于PML/RARα阴性患者。两组间CD64、CD34、HLA?DR阳性细胞率差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。CD34、HLA?DR、CD64诊断临界值分别为10.7%、11.1%、14.2%时诊断PML/RARα为阳性的敏感度和特异度较好。结论CD34、HLA?DR和CD64对诊断急性髓系白血病患者PML/RARα融合基因重排有较好的诊断性能。Objective To investigate the relationship between immune molecules and PML/RARαfusion gene and the diagnostic efficacy of immune molecules in PML/RARαfusion gene expression in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Methods A total of 120 patients with acute myeloid leukemia(initially diagnosed with FAB)from July 2016 to February 2019 in Jingzhou Central Hospital were selected.The fusion gene PML/RARαwas de?tected by fluorescence quantitative PCR,and the molecular expression of CDs were measured by flow cytometry.The patients were divided into two groups according to PML/RARαexpression.The expression differences of CDs and their association with PML/RARαwere analyzed.Results In PML/RARαpositive group,patient with posi?tive CD64 expression accounted for 75.0%,and those with positive CD34,HLA?DR and CD77.7%,7.7%and 0,respectively.In PML/RARαnegative group,the rate of patients with positive CD64,CD7,CD34,and HLA?DR was 28.6%,44.4%,77.8%,and 63.0%,respectively.Differences of the rates of patient with positive CDs were statistically significant(P<0.05).Among PML/RARαpositive patients,the quartile of CD64 positive cells was higher than that of PML/RARαnegative patients,and the quartile of CD7,CD34 and HLA?DR positive cells were lower than that of PML/RARαnegative patients.There were statistically significant differences in the rates of CD64,CD34 and HLA?DR positive cells between the two groups(P<0.05).The sensitivity and specificity of posi?tive PML/RARαwas better when the diagnostic thresholds of CD34,HLA?DR and CD64 were 10.7%,11.1%and 14.2%,respectively.Conclusion CD34,HLA?DR and CD64 have good performance in the diagnosis of PML/RARαfusion gene rearrangement in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.51