检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:景海霞[1] 王润超[1] 黄望强[1] Jing Haixia;Wang Runchao;Huang Wangqiang(Department of Dematology,Taihe Hospital,Hubei University of Medicine,Shiyan,Hubei,442000,China)
机构地区:[1]湖北医药学院附属太和医院皮肤科
出 处:《当代医学》2020年第1期186-188,共3页Contemporary Medicine
摘 要:目的为提高教学质量,探索CBL联合PBL教学法在皮肤性病学教学中的应用效果。方法选取本校2014级临床医学专业80名学生,随机分为两组,对照组40人采用传统授课法,实验组40人采用CBL联合PBL教学法,评估两组教学效果。结果实验组成绩为(88.44±4.38)分,高于对照组的(82.51±5.05)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组成绩优秀率为40.00%,高于对照组的10.00%(P<0.05),两组学生成绩均超过及格线。问卷调查显示,对于反映教学效果的9项指标,实验组对教学效果的满意度明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论CBL联合PBL教学法对于学生学习皮肤性病学明显优于传统教学法,学生成绩和学习能力得到提升。Objective To explore the application effect of CBL combined with PBL method in dermatovenereology teaching in order to improve the teaching quality.Methods 80 students majoring in clinical medicine in 2014 were randomLy divided into two groups.The traditional teaching method was used in 40 cases in the control group and CBL combined with PBL teaching method was used in another 40 cases in the experimental group to evaluate the teaching effect of the two groups.Results The score of the experimental group was(88.44±4.38),higher than that of the control group(82.51±5.05),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The excellent rate of the experimental group was 40.00%,which was much higher than 10.00%of the control group(P<0.05).The scores of both groups exceeded the passing line.For the nine indicators reflecting the teaching effect,the satisfaction of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion CBL combined with PBL teaching method is significantly better than the traditional teaching method for students to learn dermatovenereology,which enhance students’performance and learning ability.
分 类 号:G64[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145