检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄克剑[1] Huang Kejian
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学国学院
出 处:《东南学术》2020年第1期45-56,246,共13页Southeast Academic Research
摘 要:中西"中庸"观之比勘,并不在于借"中庸"这一话题对中西哲学史上的若干相关史实换一种视角再作甄述,而是要就此探寻一条价值之维的形而上致思之路,以求多少应和学界诸贤在价值平面化之当世为良知所挽留的那点不绝如缕的忧患之思。这里至关重要的是"中庸"信念的确立,而其确立却又永在修德习艺者的那种或有所"过"或有所"不及"的不懈探索中。古老的"中庸"观念并未失去哲意朦胧的神韵,问题只在于当下的人们如何诉诸相宜之生命践履将其唤醒。The comparison between Chinese and Western views of the "doctrine of the mean"does not mean to use the topic of the"doctrine of the mean"to reexamine some relevant historical facts in the history of Chinese and Western philosophy from another perspective,but means to explore a metaphysical way of thinking about the dimension of value just for responding to some extent to academic scholars’ constant adversity thoughts retained for conscience in the current world of value planarization. What matters here is the establishment of the belief in the "doctrine of the mean",and such an establishment is always unremittingly explored,sometimes "more"or sometimes "less",by the moral and art practitioners. The ancient concept of the"doctrine of the mean"has never lost its hazy philosophical charm,it is only a question of how the people of today resort to appropriate life practice and awaken it.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7