知识产权侵权不停止的司法适用模式——基于138份裁判文书的文本分析  

On the Judicial Application Mode of the Non-Cessation of IP Infringement: Based on the Text Analysis of 138 Judicial Documents

作　　者：喻玲[1] 汤鑫[2] Yu Ling;Tang Xin

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院 [2]湖南大学知识产权研究中心

出　　处：《知识产权》2020年第1期17-24,共8页Intellectual Property

基　　金：国家社科基金项目（14CFX042）阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：数据统计与个案分析表明,在知识产权侵权案件中,我国法院主要依自由裁量权主动适用侵权不停止,而不以侵权人申请为前提。公共利益是最常见的理由,履行不能、权利瑕疵等其它理由所占比例很小。在以公共利益为由的案件中,当事人双方利益平衡也是法院考量的重要因素。在法院作出侵权不停止判决的案件中,采用替代措施的仅占少数,替代措施也并不统一,以合理使用费和提高赔偿额为主。从现有司法实践来看,应设置侵害者抗辩作为前置程序,明确利益平衡原则在相关案件中的适用以及支持由法院决定替代措施及其内容类型。Data statistics and case analysis of the IP infringement cases show that Chinese courts take the initiative to apply non-cessation of IP infringement by exercising discretion,rather than base on infringer's plea.Public interest is the most frequently cited cause,while other causes such as inability of performance and defects of rights only account for a very small proportion.Of the cases based on public interest,the balance of interests between both parties is also an important factor considered by the courts.Of the non-cessation of infringement ruled by courts,only a handful of cases adopt alternative measures,which are non-uniform,including mainly reasonable royalties and raising compensation.Judging from current judicial practices,it is suggested to establish the infringer’s plea as the pre-procedure,clarify the application of balance of interests in relevant cases and empower the courts to decide on the alternative measures as well as what constitutes the measures.

关 键 词：侵权不停止 公共利益 利益平衡 前置程序 替代措施 

分 类 号：D926.13[政治法律—法学] D923.42