检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于浩[1] 郑晓军 YU Hao;ZHENG Xiaojun(Law School,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China)
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学法学院
出 处:《复旦教育论坛》2019年第6期18-26,共9页Fudan Education Forum
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“社会主义核心价值观的司法贯彻机制研究”(17VHJ008);2020年度上海市教育法学人才培养计划项目“教师行政申诉事项类型区分及程序构造”(2020JYFXR037)
摘 要:现行《教师法》已施行二十多年,诸多条款亟待修订完善。其中第39条以概括式的立法模式对教师行政申诉事项予以笼统规定,难以切实回应新时代教师权利保障的实际需求。为了更好地维护教师合法权益,首先应当明晰教师行政申诉事项的范围,选择列举式的立法模式对申诉事项进行类型区分,这也是该制度的逻辑起点;其次,以学校具体行为与抽象行为作为教师行政申诉事项类型区分的逻辑进路,从方法论层面为识别教师行政申诉事项提供操作指引;最后,对不同类型的申诉事项构造相应的申诉程序,发挥教师行政申诉程序的内在与外在价值。The current Teachers Law has been in operation for more than 20 years,and many provisions need to be revised. Article 39 adopts a general expression of teachers’ administrative appeal items,making it difficult to effectively respond to the real needs of teachers’ rights protection in the new era. In order to protect teachers’ rights,it is imperative to clarify the scope of teachers’ administrative appeal items and choose the enumerated legislation model to distinguish the types of them firstly,which is also the logical starting point of the system.Secondly,schools’ specific behaviors and abstract behaviors are regarded as the logical approach to distinguish the types of teachers’ administrative appeal items,which provides operational guidelines for identifying teachers’ administrative appeal items from the methodological perspective. Finally, it is necessary to formulate corresponding appeal procedures according to different types of appeal,so as to bring the intrinsic and extrinsic value of teacher’s administrative appeal procedure into full play.
分 类 号:G451[文化科学—教育学] D922.16[文化科学—教育技术学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43