原审被遗漏的必要共同诉讼人能否提起第三人撤销之诉——基于民事诉讼法第56条第3款的法解释学分析  

Can the Necessary Joint Litigant Ignored in the Original Trial File a Third-Party Revocation Action

作　　者：熊跃敏[1] 梁喆妮 Xiong Yuemin;Liang Zheni

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院

出　　处：《法治现代化研究》2019年第6期47-54,共8页Law and Modernization

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“民事诉讼庭前会议制度研究”（19BFX081）的阶段性成果

摘　　要：按主流观点,民事诉讼法第56条第3款排除了原审被遗漏的必要共同诉讼人提起第三人撤销之诉的资格,但审判实践却有相当数量的案例与之相异。从第56条第3款的文义解释与目的解释出发,第三人撤销之诉中的“第三人”应包含原审被遗漏的必要共同诉讼人。在具体适用方面,除须符合第56条第3款的适用要件,原审被遗漏的必要共同诉讼人提起第三人撤销之诉多以原审案件涉嫌虚假诉讼为前提。According to the mainstream opinions,the necessary joint litigant ignored in the original trial is excluded in Paragraph 3of Article 56in the Civil Procedural Law from those who are entitled to file a third-party revocation lawsuit.However,in the judicial practice there are many cases whose judgements are against such an understanding.Both textual and functional analyses of provisions at issue show that the category of third party should include the necessary joint litigant ignored in the original trial.In the specific application of law,the acceptance of the necessary joint litigant ignored in the original trial should presuppose the malpractice involved in the original case.

关 键 词：第三人撤销之诉 主体资格 必要共同诉讼人 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]