检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡思博[1,2] HU Sibo
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学 [2]中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院
出 处:《思想战线》2020年第2期124-131,共8页Thinking
基 金:北京社会科学青年基金项目“对虚假仲裁的查明与规制”阶段性成果(18FX017);中国政法大学科研创新年度青年项目“民事检察监督的技术规则研究”阶段性成果(18ZFQ82004)
摘 要:诉讼心态是社会观念的写照,二者之间存在因果和延续关系。我国部分民事案件当事人在当前社会观念下,存在妨碍诉讼的不当心态,表现为一味追逐个人实体权益之目标下的程序效益忽略、逐利性诉讼动机下的诉讼态度摇摆、虚假诉请和证据的广泛存在、精准诉讼不能下的投机性宏观诉讼,以及对民事诉讼活动的消极不配合、与其他诉讼参与者的利益博弈等,使得诉讼目的发生扭曲、诉讼价值无法正确体现,且审判权对此常难以有效规制。为此,从司法审判的角度说,法官可以对诉讼价值进行观念性引导、对诉讼程序进行国情性改造、对诉讼规则进行技术性指导。同时,在法庭审理过程中科学合理运用心态审判技巧,以此推动当事人的诉讼心态向健康、积极的方向发展。litigants’mentality mirrors their ideas of things,for what they feel is related to what they think in a chain of causation.Some litigants in China’s civil cases impede litigation because they have an improper mentality shaped by their ideas of things.This mentality finds expression in their ignoring the proceedings for self interests,their wavering of attitudes on account of interest-driven motivations,their extensive false appeals and evidences,their speculative macroscopic lawsuit which makes precise litigation impossible,their refusal to cooperate,and their game-playing with other parties in the lawsuit.All these acts distort the purpose of litigation and make it hard for litigation to realize its value.And quite often it is difficult for the judges to harness these acts.Thus from the angle of jurisdiction,the judges can inform the litigants of the value of litigation,and modify procedures according to specific situation,and give technical guidance to parties involved in the litigation.Meanwhile,they should make good use of mentality trial techniques to lead the litigants’mentality to a healthy and positive direction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.124.95