理解、诠释与分判中国哲学的一组参照系──“分解的思路”以及“全体论与整体实存的思路”  

A Set of Reference Systems for Understanding,Interpreting and Subdividing Chinese Philosophy

作　　者：陈立骧 CHEN Lixiang(General Education Center,Gaoyuan University of Science and Technology,Kaohsiung,Taiwan 82152.China)

机构地区：[1]台湾高苑科技大学通识教育中心,台湾高雄82152

出　　处：《吉林师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2020年第2期48-54,共7页Journal Of Jilin Normal University:Humanities & Social Science Edition

摘　　要：文章主要在提出“分解的思路”和“全体论与整体实存的思路”此一参照系,以作为学界理解、诠释与分判传统中国哲学的参考。全文除了说明笔者近二十年来中国哲学研究的一个“核心问题意识”、一组“分判标准”以及两个“主要论点”外,并且枚举了“理”与“气”、“心斋”以及“色即是空”与“空即是色”三个例子,来说明此两“思路”的不同,并于文末作出三点简要总结。This paper mainly proposes the reference system of"subdivided thinking"and"totalistic&holistic existential thinking"as a reference for the understanding,interpretation and subdivision of traditional Chinese philosophy.In addition to explaining the author's research on Chinese philosophy in the past 20 years,he has a"core problem consciousness",a set of"sub-criteria"and two"main arguments".and enumerates three examples of"Li&Qi","Xinzhai"and"Form itself is emptiness&Emptiness itself is form"to illustrate the difference between the two"Thinking".At the end of this paper,the author made a brief summary of three points.

关 键 词：心斋 理与气 分解的思路 色即是空与空即是色 全体论与整体实存的思路 

分 类 号：B2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]