检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王中奎 张民选[1] WANG Zhongkui;ZHANG Minxuan
机构地区:[1]上海师范大学国际与比较教育研究院,上海200234 [2]上海市教育科学研究院,上海200234
出 处:《比较教育学报》2020年第1期86-104,共19页Journal of Comparative Education
基 金:全国教育科学规划国家青年课题“中小学校长生存状态的实证研究”(项目编号:CHA180269)。
摘 要:教师教学国际调查(TALIS)数据显示,不同国家(地区)的教师工作满意度不尽相同,且呈现与惯常经验相悖的情境:比如,在国际学生评估项目(PISA)中学生学业成绩高的部分国家(地区),教师工作满意度反而较低;而学生学业成绩低的部分国家(地区),教师工作满意度反而较高。本文在国别文化差异的视角下,对不同国家(地区)文化与教师工作满意度的关系进行了模式化概括和类型划分;随后,在笔者借鉴已有工作满意度理论构建的“层类交错”分析框架下,重点对全球7个“高水平教育系统”的教师工作满意度影响因素及构面表现进行了比较;最后,根据比较分析结果尝试提出了改善教师工作满意度的建议。The Teaching and Learning International Survey(TALIS)shows that teachers’job satisfaction varies crossing countries(economies),and presents situations that run counter to usual experiences,f.x.Teachers’job satisfaction is lower in some countries where students have higher academic performance in the Program for International Student Assessment(PISA).Meanwhile,teachers’job satisfaction is higher in countries where students’academic performance is lower in PISA.By the perspective of national cultural differences,this study has modeled and classified the relationship between the cultures of different countries(by economies)and teachers’job satisfaction.Subsequently,under the analysis framework of"Stratification-to-Classification interleaving",which constructed on the existing job satisfaction theories,this study compared the influencing factors and facets performance of teachers’job satisfaction among the world’s seven high-performing education systems(HPES).Finally,according to the results of comparative analysis,suggestions for improving teachers’job satisfaction are put forward.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3