检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张珊珊[1] 张野[1] 陈萌萌[1] ZHANG Shan-shan;ZHANG Ye;CHEN Meng-meng(College of Education Science,Shenyang Normal University,Shenyang 110034,China)
机构地区:[1]沈阳师范大学教育科学学院,辽宁沈阳110034
出 处:《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2020年第1期95-102,共8页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“欺凌治理视域下中小学校园排斥预防与干预体系建构的实证研究”(BHA180128)。
摘 要:考察社会排斥危机对儿童欺骗行为的影响以及归属需要的调节作用。实验一采用偶然排斥任务和问题解决数字矩阵任务,考察社会排斥危机对儿童欺骗行为的影响;实验二采用归属需要问卷筛选高水平、低水平归属需要的被试,进一步考察归属需要高水平在社会排斥危机影响儿童欺骗行为中的调节作用。实验一发现,社会排斥危机组的欺骗行为显著高于社会排斥组和控制组。实验二发现,在高社会排斥危机下,儿童利团体欺骗行为显著高于儿童利个人欺骗行为,高归属需要组的利团体欺骗行为显著多于低归属需要组。社会排斥危机导致儿童欺骗行为,且归属需要可以调节社会排斥威胁对欺骗行为的影响。This paper is designed to explore the influence of social exclusion crisis on,children’s deceptive behavior,and the regulatory role of belonging needs.The first task is finished in Experiment One,by employing the random exclusion task and problem-solving digital matrix task;the second one is carried on in Experiment Two by adopting attribution needs questionnaire to select the high-level and low-level subjects.The cheating behavior of the Social Exclusion Crisis Group,the former tells,was significantly higher than that of the Social Exclusion Group and the Control Group.Children’s group deception,in the high social exclusion crisis,the latter finds,was significantly higher than children’s individual deception,and the group deception in the high needs group was significantly higher than that in the low needs group.The crisis of social exclusion leads to children’s deception,and the need of belonging can adjust the influence of social exclusion threat on such negative behavior.
关 键 词:校园欺凌 社会排斥危机 利团体欺骗行为 利个人欺骗行为 归属需要
分 类 号:G47[文化科学—教育学] G44[文化科学—教育技术学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.20