我国省级疾病预防控制中心食品污染物及有害因素检测质量保证和普及程度分析  

Test quality assurance and popularity analysis of food contaminants and harmful factors in provincial CDC

作　　者：郭贵阁 王文军[1] 张凡非[1] 武镪[1] 王彩云[1] GUO Gui-ge;WANG Wen-jun;ZHANG Fan-fei;WU Qiang;WANG Cai-yun(Shanxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Taiyuan,Shanxi 030012,China)

机构地区：[1]山西省疾病预防控制中心,山西太原030012

出　　处：《中国卫生检验杂志》2020年第4期490-492,共3页Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology

摘　　要：目的了解省级疾病预防控制中心食品安全风险监测食品污染物及有害因素质量保证情况。提出加强质量保证的建议。方法统计省级疾病预防控制中心食品污染物及有害因素检测项目通过实验室认可的数据,计算得出质量保证指数和普及指数。结果东部省份疾病预防控制中心比中部和西部质量保证指数平均高18%;4个项目普及指数> 90,双酚A及并殖吸虫认可率和普及指数均低。结论各省份质量保证指数总体偏低,地区有明显差距,东部省份优于中西部省份。食品污染物及有害因素检测能力提升与实验室认可的质量管理工作衔接不通畅。Objective To understand the quality assurance situation of food contaminants and harmful factors in provincial CDC and offer suggestions on strengthening quality assurance. Methods According to the statistics of the food contaminants and harmful factors item which accredited by CNAS in provincial CDC,calculate quality assurance index and popularization index.Results The quality assurance index of provincial CDC in eastern was about 18% higher than that in central and western provinces;4 item popularization index were more than 90. Bis phenol A and paragonimus’ accreditation rate and popularization index are both low. Conclusion Quality assurance of each province is generally low,there is an obvious gap between eastern and middle-western regions,but it is better in the eastern. There is no effective linkage between detection capability improvement of food contaminants and harmful factors items and quality management of laboratory accreditation.

关 键 词：实验室认可 食品污染物及有害因素 省疾病预防控制中心 质量保证 

分 类 号：R155.5[医药卫生—营养与食品卫生学]