南北宗论的史学转向——西学东渐与问题虚构  

Historical Turn in the Theory of Northern and Southern School of Painting——the Eastward Spread of Western Learning and Problem Assumption

作　　者：韦宾[1] WEI Bin

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学美术学院,陕西西安710119

出　　处：《艺术探索》2020年第1期14-26,共13页Arts Exploration

基　　金：2017年度国家社科基金艺术学项目“中国近世绘画思潮研究”(17BF101)。

摘　　要：南北宗论本来只是一种画学主张,但在清代,南北宗论却被以地理概念来解释,并逐渐演变为一种历史结论。这种趋向在西方史学输入后得到强化,南北宗论被理解为对绘画历史事实的总结,并在二十世纪受到强烈批判。The theory of Northern and Southern school of painting was originally a proposition for painting,but in the Qing Dynasty,it was explained by the concept of geography and gradually evolved into a historical conclusion.This trend was strengthened after the introduction of western historiography,and the theory of Northern and Southern school of painting was understood as a summary of the historical facts of painting,and was strongly criticized in the 20th century.

关 键 词：南北宗论 地理 史学 古史辨 

分 类 号：J212[艺术—美术]