检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:齐晓云[1,2] 王磊 QI Xiaoyun;WANG Lei(Department of Public Administration,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China;School of Management,Jilin University,Changchun 130025,China)
机构地区:[1]中国民航大学人文学院,天津300300 [2]吉林大学管理学院,长春130025
出 处:《综合运输》2020年第3期76-80,共5页China Transportation Review
基 金:天津市教育科学“十三五”规划课题(BE3254)。
摘 要:校园火灾、学生交通事故、食物中毒等安全事件频发说明我国学生安全意识较差,校园公共安全教育存在问题。为系统了解我国学校公共安全教育现状,提升教育针对性,本文从交通安全、人身安全、卫生安全、心理安全、自然灾害安全、消防安全、财产安全、体育安全、食品安全、网络安全对我国现行教育体系中各阶段学生的安全行为及教育现状进行调研,并运用灰色关联分析找出其主要关联因素。结果发现,学生安全行为并未随着年龄增长而提高,各阶段的主要关联因素及各类型安全行为的关联因素均有所区别。The campus fires,student traffic accidents,food poisoning reflect the poor public safety awareness of C hinese students and there are problem s in school public safety education.In order to understand systematically the current situation of school public safety education in China,and improve education effetely,it investigated the safety behavior and education status of students in all stages of the current education system in China,from the traffic safety,personal safety,health safety,psychological safety,natural disaster safety,fire safety,property safety,sports safety,food safety,network safety.Then the main related factors of safety behavior were found out through gray correlation analysis.The results show that the safety behavior of students did not increase with age,and the main related factors at each stage and each type of safety behavior were different.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90