检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨梓樱 朱益明[1,2] Yang Ziying;Zhu Yiming(Department of Education/National Institutes of Educational Policy Research of East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062)
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学教育学系,上海200062 [2]华东师范大学国家教育宏观政策研究院,上海200062
出 处:《职业技术教育》2020年第7期66-72,共7页Vocational and Technical Education
基 金:华东师范大学国家教育宏观政策研究院博士生专项课题“产教融合背景下地方应用型院校发展研究”(201802008S),主持人:杨梓樱。
摘 要:美国作为世界经济第一强国,职业教育历史悠久而且发展体系健全。美国高度重视职业教育项目的评估,通过立法强化评估的地位,并将评估与问责结合。联邦政府各部门、各州/地方政府、各院校和各类组织相互协调,制定评估指标与标准,尝试多样化的评估模型与方法,共同推进职业教育评估工作的开展。借鉴美国经验,我国应该从强化立法评估的法律地位、建立动态评价指标、实施多维度分类评估、搭建职业教育大数据系统等四个方面做好职业教育的评估工作。As the world's largest economy,the United States has a long history of vocational education and a sound development system.The United States attaches great importance to the evaluation of vocational education programs,through legislation to strengthen the status of evaluation,and the combination of evaluation and accountability.The departments of the federal government,state/local governments,colleges and universities,and various organizations coordinate with each other to develop evaluation indicators and standards,and try diverse evaluation models and methods,jointly promote the development of vocational education evaluation.These measures make the vocational education program assessment of the United States in the forefront of the world,which is worth learning from our country.At this stage,China should strengthen the evaluation of the legal status of government evaluation;establish dynamic evaluation indicators;implement multi-dimensional classification evaluation;build a vocational education big data system to do a good job in vocational education evaluation.
分 类 号:G719.712[文化科学—职业技术教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.160.127