检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张志宏[1] Zhang Zhihong
出 处:《文史哲》2020年第3期97-104,167,共9页Literature,History,and Philosophy
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“中国古代人权思想研究”(13CZX033)的阶段性研究成果.
摘 要:近代中国社会的巨大变迁是导致传统文化及其理论形态--中国哲学--受到贬抑的重要根源。百多年来,中国哲学研究者努力探索传统理论现代转型的路径。他们从现实的事功需要出发,以西方哲学的思辨框架对中国哲学进行批判和改造。然而这种努力却在一定程度上抑制了中国哲学发展的内生动力,使中国哲学丧失了自身的活力和特色。中国哲学具有观察问题的独特视角、认知世界的独特思维模式、处理现实问题的独特价值立场,具体表现为对"道"的皈依立场和以道之"正"治世之"不正"的理论旨趣。只有重新回到这一本质和根基,确立以"道"为价值根据、以"正"治现实问题为学术立场的哲学发展思路,构建"中国特色"的哲学理论体系、学科体系、话语体系,重建中国哲学面向现实的自然、自由、自主发展机制,才能真正实现中国哲学的现代转型。The great change of modern Chinese social life is the cause of the disparagement of its traditional culture and its theoretical form,i.e.,Chinese philosophy.Scholars of traditional philosophical theory have been exploring a way of transition to its updated form since a century ago,but their effort seems to weaken the internal dynamic of Chinese philosophy itself,which has its unique perspectives of observation and axiological standpoint,as well as alternative ways of apprehending the world.These characters are realized as going back to Dao and deal the unjust theoretical directions with the just Dao.For contemporary scholars of traditional culture and philosophy,it is necessary to return to this just approach,founded on Dao and investing the reality with"Justness".Only in this way,can the systematic rebuild of Chinese philosophy and the disciplines concerned succeed,and the transition of traditional Chinese philosophy is made possible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31