论海德格尔存在论视域下的劳动异化问题  

The Alienation of Labor from the Perspective of Heidegger’s Ontology

作　　者：吴学国[1] 单虹泽 Wu Xueguo;Shan Hongze

机构地区：[1]南开大学哲学院,天津300350

出　　处：《南开学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第3期99-111,共13页Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition

摘　　要：《存在与时间》阐明了人们日常制作、使用和修理用具的操劳包含的存在揭示机制,它事实上揭示出人类劳动的真正存在论向度,因而也将劳动异化问题置于存在论的视域之下。无论是海德格尔早期对于此在在制作和使用用具活动中的沉沦现象的阐释,还是晚期对技术生产对人类早期劳动之扭曲的分析,都在本质上涉及人类劳动实践的异化;它们实际上揭示出劳动异化的存在论向度,在本质上深化了我们对劳动异化的理解。这些思考与马克思的劳动异化理论存在明显的呼应和实质的互补性,必能为马克思主义实践哲学在今天的创造性发展提供重要启迪。Sein und Zeit(Being and Time)by Martin Heidegger covers the disclosure of the concept of Dasein(being),implied in the daily producing,using and fixing of labor tools,and displays the ontological dimension of human labor,thus highlighting the issue of the alienation of labor in the discourse of ontology.Both his earlier interpretation on the phenomena of the deterioration of Dasein in producing and using tools and his later analysis on early human labor distorted by modern technological productivity,are essentially related with the alienation of labor.Hence,the alienation of human labor ipso facto has been revealed from the ontological dimension and our comprehension about it has been fundamentally deepened.Thus,Heidegger’s thinking is apparently complemented with Marxist theory about the alienation of labor,and can provide inspirations for the innovative development of contemporary Marxist philosophy on practice.

关 键 词：劳动异化 此在生存论分析 沉沦 技术生产 

分 类 号：B516.54[哲学宗教—外国哲学]