“N是N”类名词性重言构式的双重转喻及推导机制  

The Bi-metonymy of“N Is N”as a Nominal Tautology Construction and Its Inference Mechanism

作　　者：冯梅 侯国金[3] FENG Mei;HOU Guo-jin

机构地区：[1]西南医科大学外国语学院,四川泸州646000 [2]广东外语外贸大学 [3]华侨大学外国语学院,福建泉州362021

出　　处：《华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第3期148-160,共13页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“构式语法的语用修辞学研究”(18BYY216)。

摘　　要：从新兴的词汇—构式语用学视角审视名词性重言构式“N是N”,揭示了该构式的形式(语音、形态和句法)特征和语义特征,阐释了生成良构性名词性重言构式的语用条件,着重解析了该构式的生成和推导机制。文章认为,言者凭借概念转喻“语用制约”地生成词汇/短语层级的语法转喻,借此“语用压制”地生成语句层级的语法转喻和语用转喻。名词性重言构式是双重或多重转喻体,言者受较高元语用意识的驱动,旨在生成一定的构式义尤其是一定的省力而幽默的构式效,而受众为了攫取该构式义和构式效一般需要进行两三次三步推导。This paper examines“N is N”as a nominal tautology construction,by the framework of lexico-constructional pragmatics as an emerging interdiscipline.We first demonstrate the formal(morphological,phonological and syntactic)and semantic features of the construction,and then account for the pragmatic conditions for a well-formed“N is N”construct(ion).It is maintained that the speaker,by conceptual metonymy and“pragmatic constraints”,generates a grammatical metonymy underlying the second N(in the lexical/phrasal rank),and that on the basis of this he“pragma-coercively”generates a grammatical metonymy and a pragmatic metonymy(in the syntactic rank).This construction is actually a double-or even multi-metonymy matrix whose speaker,driven by high meta-pragmatic awareness,expects a given constructional effect of economy and humour apart from a given constructional meaning.On the other hand,the audience can retrieve this constructional meaning and effect only by a three-step inference that usually lasts twice or thrice.

关 键 词：名词性重言构式 语法转喻 语用转喻 语用条件 语用压制 

分 类 号：H03[语言文字—语言学]