我国情报学研究方法体系构建研究的转向突破  

The Turning and Breakthrough in Research Paradigm of Intelligence Methodology System

作　　者：李博闻 章成志[1] Li Bowen

机构地区：[1]南京理工大学经济管理学院信息管理系,江苏南京210094

出　　处：《情报理论与实践》2020年第6期37-43,共7页Information Studies:Theory & Application

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“情报学学科建设与情报工作未来发展路径研究”的成果之一,项目编号:17ZDA291。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]透过国内情报学研究方法体系构建研究式微、研究方法使用情况调查研究兴起的表象,揭示"此消彼长"背后是研究方法世界揭示范式的危机与转向突破。[方法/过程]首先,界定、分疏两类研究,提出研究问题;其次,结合CNKI与万方检索、内容分析法、文献追溯法,获得并梳理53篇相关文献;第三,探讨两类研究进展;第四,就情报学研究方法体系构建研究的范式危机进行论述;第五,比较新旧范式,就转向与突破的必然进行论述。[结果/结论]这种范式转向既是可贵探索也是困局突围的现实途径。新范式不仅有助于建设一个适合中国特色与情报特点的研究方法体系,其确立与完善更能够为科学界提供一个适合时代特征与情报学特征的专门研究方法。[局限]情报学与图书馆学、信息学历史上交叉、关联乃至趋同的关系是毋庸置疑的,文献调查未考虑其他学科领域是不足之处。[Purposes/significance] Research on intelligence methodology system began to decline while the survey of usage of research method was increased.We could see through the appearance to perceive the essence is the turning and breakthrough in research paradigm of intelligence methodology system.[Method/process] Firstly,define and discuss the conception of the two research paradigm separately and put forward the research questions.Secondly,by using literature research method,content analysis and literatures tracing,a total of 53 journal articles,research on two topics,were retrieved by CNKI and WANFANGDATA.Thirdly,introduce the development of two topics.Fourthly,discuss the paradigm crisis in different perspective.Finally,illustrate the historical necessity of the paradigm shift.[Result/conclusion] It’s indicate the paradigm shift is valuable exploration and realistic approach and also will contributed to scientific circles.[Limitations] A limitation of this study is ignoring the close relationship among intelligence science,library science and information science is clearly.

关 键 词：情报学 研究方法 情报研究方法 方法论 研究范式 方法体系 

分 类 号：G350[文化科学—情报学]