检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨颖 焦丽颖 许燕 高树青 Yang Ying;Jiao Liying;Xu Yan;Gao Shuqing(Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology,National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education(Beijing Normal University),Faculty of Psychology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875)
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学心理学部,应用实验心理北京市重点实验室,心理学国家级实验教学示范中心(北京师范大学),北京100875
出 处:《心理科学》2020年第3期519-525,共7页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(31671160);国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAI36B03);贵阳孔学堂阳明心学与当代社会心态研究院重大课题(KXTXT201601)的资助。
摘 要:人们喜欢关注道德事件并表达自己的立场。以往研究发现回忆自己(而非他人)的道德行为能影响个体的道德自我知觉和道德行为。本研究关注参与道德评价是否会对个体的道德自我和道德行为产生影响。2个研究共同发现:(1)存在道德"沾光"效应:评价支持他人的道德事件,或反对他人的不道德事件,能提升个体的道德自我知觉;(2)道德评价通过提升道德自我知觉,进一步增加个体的道德行为。Moral events always draw attention to themselves.People tend to demonstrate their moral stand by evaluating those events.Previous studies have found that recalling one’s own(rather than others’)past moral behaviors would influence his or her own moral self-perception and moral behaviors.As an intermediate state between one’s own and others’moral behaviors,could evaluating moral events publicly influence people’s moral self-perception and moral behaviors?If so,how?The current study involved two experiments.The first one was a one-factor(3 evaluation on:moral,immoral and neutral events)betweensubjects design with 145 valid participants.Participants were required to write down comments on five events at their respective group and then give tests on their moral self-conception and prosocial intensions.Results showed that 3 groups had significant differences in moral self-perception(F(2,140)=4.10,p<.05,η~2=.06).Participants in moral(M=5.98,SD=.88)or immoral group(M=6.00,SD=.86)had higher moral self-perception than control group(M=5.61,SD=.90),which confirmed the basking in reflected glory effect in moral filed.Although moral evaluation did not have direct influence on prosocial intention(F(2,140)=.64,p>.05),the moral self-perception mediated the relationship between moral evaluation and moral behaviors.The 95%confidence interval were[.019,.384](moral vs.control group)and[.047,.381](immoral vs.control group)respectively,both of which did not include zero.That is,after moral evaluation,the promotion in moral self-perception could increase prosocial intentions.The second experiment had similar procedure with the first one except for two differences.Firstly,moral self-perception and other positive self-perception(such as smart,humorous)were both measured to verify moral evaluations’specific effects on moral self-perception.Secondly,actual prosocial behavior instead of prosocial intentions were measured.There were 117 valid participants.The results were consistent with the first experiment.Participants in mora
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112