检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李玲[1,2] 刘一波[1] 戴秋萍 Li Ling;Liu Yibo;Dai Qiuping(Education Policy Institute,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715;Southwest University Branch,Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality in Beijing Normal University,Chongqing 400715)
机构地区:[1]西南大学教育政策研究所,重庆400715 [2]北京师范大学中国基础教育协同创新中心西南大学分中心,重庆400715
出 处:《中国电化教育》2020年第7期10-19,44,共11页China Educational Technology
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“教育阻断贫困代际传递的政策设计与评估研究”(项目编号:18ZDA338)资助;教育部规划司课题“‘十四五’时期教育改革发展的国内外环境及目标任务研究”(课题编号:SSW202006)研究成果
摘 要:该文总结义务教育“十三五”期间“补短板”“优化教育资源配置”取得的成果,依据习近平总书记教育扶贫思想、马克思“人的全面发展”、分配正义等理论,提出我国义务教育“十四五”发展规划的目标任务;通过全国范围大型调查,结合德尔菲法,构建包括28项指标的评估指标体系,评估这些目标任务。包括乡镇寄宿制学校与乡村小规模学校办学条件达标率、互联网接入率、多媒体教室普及率、乡村小规模学校经费使用管理合格率、乡镇大型寄宿制学校校医与心理辅导员配备率、政府购买乡镇寄宿制学校工勤人员服务覆盖率、乡村教师保障性住房覆盖率、教师与当地公务员工资比例、教师“县管校聘”覆盖率与农村校长领导力等城乡、区域、学校间人财物配置差距的指标;教育机会指标:辍学率(显性和隐性辍学率);教育质量指标:不仅包括学生德智体美劳发展,还包括学生自我教育期望、自我效能感、学校归属感等指标。运用线性加权综合评价法集成指数,评估全国和各级政府“十四五”规划目标任务达成度,根据该指标体系和指数评估结果,精准指导各级政府出台配套政策与措施。This article summarizes the achievements of the education sector made during the“Thirteenth Five-Year Plan”period,focusing on“remediation”and“the optimization of the allocation of educational resources”.In addition,based on Xi Jinping’s thoughts on poverty alleviation through education,Marx’s theory of“all-round development of individuals”,and theories of distributive justice,this article proposes the objectives and tasks of the“Fourteenth Five-Year Plan”for the development of compulsory education in China.Furthermore,this article constructs an evaluation index system including 28 indicators to evaluate these goals and tasks by adopting the Delphi method,including“hidden drop-out rate”“proportion of school doctors and psychological counselors in large boarding schools in towns”“the rates of qualified boarding schools in towns and small-scale rural schools”“the rate of effective utilization of funds in small-scale rural schools”“coverage rate of affordable housing for rural teachers”“the rate of boarding school services funded by the government”“teacher to local government employee pay ratio”“the percentage of the teachers administered by the county”and“rural principal leadership”,etc.In particular,the indicators of education quality not only focus on students’development in moral,intelligence,aesthetics,sports,and labor performance,but also pays attention to students’“educational expectations”“sense of belonging to the school”and“other indicators related to intrinsic motivation and fulfillment”.The linear weighted comprehensive evaluation method are used to integrate the indexes to assess how the state and governments at all levels have accomplished the objectives and tasks of the“Fourteenth Five-Year Plan”.According to the evaluation index system and evaluation results,governments of all levels are accurately guided to issue supporting policies and measures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15