语篇连接词的连接性及其在广义论证中的作用  

Connectivity of Discourse Connectives and Its Role for Generalized Argumentation

作　　者：胡扬[1] Yang Hu(Department of Philosophy,East China Normal University)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学哲学系

出　　处：《逻辑学研究》2020年第3期82-105,共24页Studies in Logic

摘　　要：语篇连接词研究有三种主要理论进路:弗雷泽(Fraser)的一般理论、希夫林(Schiffrin)的连贯论以及布莱克莫尔(Blakemore)的关联论。三者认同语篇连接词的连接性,却对其给出了不同的解释。这种解释差异的根源在于,语篇连接词在三种理论框架下中有不同的功能设定:在一般理论里其用于标示语篇元素的语义关系,在连贯论里其用于建立文本结构,而在关联论里其用于引导与话语解释相关的认知推理。因此,语篇连接词实际上有三种连接性:语义连接性,结构连接性和认知连接性。这三类语篇连接性有助于理解鞠实儿提出的"广义论证",即论证是语篇序列。There are three major accounts of discourse connectives:Fraser’s General Account,Schiffrin’s Coherence-based Account and Blakemore’s Relevance-theoretic Account.They all acknowledge the connectivity of discourse connectives,but they explain in different ways.Their difference consists in characterizations of the role of discourse connectives:the first considers the connectives as signaling the semantic relation between discourses,the second takes them to be the joints of text structure,and the third thinks of them as guiding the cognitive inference as regards utterance interpretation.Thus,we have three kinds of connectivity of the discourse connectives:semantic connectivity,structural connectivity and cognitive connectivity.These three kinds of connectivity can respectively contribute to understanding the thesis of Generalized Argumentation proposed by Ju Shi’er that argumentation is a sequence of discourses.

关 键 词：语篇连接词 关联论 认知推理 语义关系 标示语 广义论证 连接性 文本结构 

分 类 号：H315[语言文字—英语]