中心的缺失:论德里达的增补阐释  

The Absence of Center: On Derrida’s Supplementary Interpretation

作　　者：王晶石[1] WANG Jing-shi

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学外国语学院,大连116024

出　　处：《求是学刊》2020年第2期154-162,共9页Seeking Truth

基　　金：辽宁省哲学社会科学规划基金项目青年项目“庞德《诗章》中表意文字法的演变研究”(L17CWW003);大连理工大学基本科研业务费一般项目“‘药’的修辞学:德里达的文学思想研究”(DUT19RW130)。

摘　　要：德里达"中心的缺失"揭示了增补阐释的发生和运行,明确了其公共性,即增补的发生过程具有建构性,阐释本身具有公度性"。中心的缺失"在文本中体现为文本的疏异性,疏异性开启增补阐释,其根源在于解构主义视域下理性与非理性边界的模糊。作为对文本缺失中心的增补,阐释的补充性和替代性赋予阐释以建构性,其作为书写本质的可重复性和非同一性赋予阐释以公度性。但是由于非理性的作用,增补本身的相对性和自我矛盾性使增补阐释逐渐背离了原始文本的意义,使阐释走向相对主义和虚无主义的反理性。Derrida’s"Absence of Center"reveals the initiation and operation of the supplementary interpreta-tion, clarifies its publicness that is, the process of supplementary interpretation is constructive, and the inter-pretation itself is public. The"absence of the center"is manifested in the text as the heterogeneity of the text,which opens up complementary elaborations. It stems from the blurring of rational and irrational boundariesfrom the perspectives of deconstructionism. Supplementarity and substitution of interpretation as additions tothe missing center of the text give it constructive character, and its repeatability and non-identity as the es-sence of writing give it metric character. However, because of irrationality, the relative and self-contradictorynature of the supplementary itself makes the supplementary interpretation gradually depart from the meaningof the original text, leading the interpretation towards a relativistic and nihilistic anti-rationalism.

关 键 词：增补阐释 公共阐释 德里达 非理性 中心 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]