检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨越[1] 黄贻刚[1] 宋祥波[1] 王建忠[1] YANG Yue;HUANG Yigang;SONG Xiangbo;WANG Jianzhong(College of Air Traffic Management,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China)
机构地区:[1]中国民航大学空中交通管理学院,天津300300
出 处:《中国安全科学学报》2020年第3期8-14,共7页China Safety Science Journal
基 金:天津市教委科研项目(2018KJ249);中央高校基本科研业务费中国民航大学专项资助(3122018C031,3122013C001)。
摘 要:针对当前我国空管单位在监测和评估管制员(ATCO)工作效能时普遍存在的主观性强、结果差异性大等问题,首先设计基于飞行航迹、管制空域、设备操作以及指令发布数据的管制效能测评指标体系,从飞行安全、运行效率、管制规则3个方面研究指标的测评流程和计算方法,并基于模糊综合评价法量化指标分值;然后在Matlab平台上开发管制效能测评系统,并应用我国某扇区的模拟运行数据验证系统的有效性。研究结果表明:与传统的检查单评价法相比,用这种基于客观运行数据的效能测评方法能够对管制员的操作技能和决策水平进行集成化、定量化和智能化的综合评估,快速获得准确评价结果。In order to address the common problem of strong subjectivity and obvious differences in monitoring and evaluating ATCO’s work performance by air traffic management organizations in China,an assessment index system was designed based on flight tracks,controlling airspaces,device operation data and instruction release data. Then,assessment procedure and calculation method of indexes were studied from aspects of flight safety,operational efficiency and controlling rules,and their value was quantified by utilizing fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. Finally,the evaluation system was released on Matlab platform and validated with simulative operation data in certain sector of China. The research shows that this objective data-based assessment method makes more integrated,quantitative and intelligent evaluation of ATCO’ s operational skills and decision-making capacity compared with traditional checklist assessment method,therefore it can help obtain evaluation results more quickly and accurately.
关 键 词:管制员(ATCO) 工作效能 测评指标 模糊综合评价 检查单
分 类 号:X949[环境科学与工程—安全科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40