浅析“或裁或审”条款的性质与效力  

On the Nature and Effect of “Arbitration or Litigation” Clause

作　　者：翟仲 Zhai Zhong(International Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai,200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学国际法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《黑龙江工业学院学报（综合版）》2020年第5期133-139,共7页Journal of Heilongjiang University of Technology(Comprehensive Edition)

摘　　要："或裁或审"条款是指当事人约定既可以起诉,又可以向指定仲裁机构提交仲裁的条款。判断"或裁或审"条款的关键在于仲裁协议和管辖协议之间是实质上的并列关系。约定仲裁在先,协议管辖在后的"先裁后审"条款不是"或裁或审"条款。司法实践中,出现了从一律认定"或裁或审"条款中仲裁协议和管辖协议无效到分别确认仲裁协议和管辖协议效力的转变。应秉持有利于仲裁原则和当事人意思自治原则综合判断"或裁或审"条款的效力。"Arbitration or Litigation"Clause refers to the clause subject to which both parties are entitled to bring a lawsuit or submit their disputes to the designated arbitration organization. The key to identify such clauses lies in recognizing the substantial "parallel"relationship between the arbitration and litigation agreements.The arbitration before litigation clause,which set the arbitration agreement to be the condition of the latter litigation agreement,should not be recognized as "Arbitration or Litigation"Clause. There exist a profound change from denying the legality of both arbitration agreement and litigation agreement to adjudicating their effects respectively in the recent judicial practices. It should be noted that the effect of "Arbitration or Litigation"Clause should be decided considering the principle of party autonomy and encouraging arbitration.

关 键 词：仲裁协议 或裁或审 管辖协议 意思自治原则 

分 类 号：DF75[政治法律—诉讼法学]