美国教师惩戒权中的强制措施及其启示  

The Compulsory Measures in the American Teachers’ Disciplinary Power and Their Enlightenment

作　　者：郑思铭 ZHENG Siming(School of Law,Fujian Normal University,Fujian 350108,China)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学法学院,福建福州350108

出　　处：《泉州师范学院学报》2020年第3期95-101,共7页Journal of Quanzhou Normal University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目(16BFX046)。

摘　　要：美国教师惩戒权的强制措施中,对于搜查扣押权的规定非常精细,涵盖了对学生储物柜的搜查、对学生随身物品的搜查、对学生人身搜查以及警察介入搜查的规定,对学生的危险行为有明确界定。我国《中小学教师实施教育惩戒规则(征求意见稿)》第九条也是关于强制措施的规定,相比之下,内容不够完善,对于人身搜查和公安机关介入搜查没有作详细的规定,并且对学生危险行为的含义界定模糊。学生的人身搜查涉及学生的人身权利,公安机关必要时的介入也会对完善教育惩戒起促进作用,学生的危险行为应当作细致化的区分,这些都应该在第九条规定中得到完善和补充。Among the mandatory measures of teachers’disciplinary power in the United States,the provisions on the right of seizure are very detailed,including the search of students’lockers,the search of students’personal belongings,the search of students’body and the police intervention search,and the provisions on the clear definition of students’dangerous behaviors.Article 9 of China’s rules for the implementation of educational punishment by primary and secondary school teachers(draft for comments)is also a provision on compulsory measures.By contrast,the content is not perfect,there are no detailed provisions on personal search and the intervention of public security organs,and the definition of students’dangerous behaviors is vague.Students’personal search involves students’personal rights,the intervention of public security organs,when necessary,will also play a role in promoting the improvement of educational punishment,and students’dangerous behaviors should be differentiated in detail,which should be improved and supplemented in article 9.

关 键 词：美国 教师惩戒权 教育法 教师权利 

分 类 号：G40-011.8[文化科学—教育学原理]