监所外提讯所获供述的证据资格考察与程序构建  

Evidence qualification and procedure construction of the confession obtained outside the prison

作　　者：李伟亚 LI Weiya(School of Criminal Justice, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan, China)

机构地区：[1]河南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《河南理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第3期16-21,共6页Journal of Henan Polytechnic University:Social Sciences

摘　　要：监所外提讯是案件侦查的重要环节,但因“提解”与“提讯”的实质融合而出现制度偏差,妥当解决侦查取证与被告人权利保障之间的价值冲突,成为被告人监所外供述证据资格证成的首要举措。监所外提讯所获取供述须符合法定证据要件,并且遵循供述自愿规则、非法证据排除规制的合法取证路径,在程序建构方面需要制定高层级的统一行为规范,以及全面推行全程录音、录像制度,如此才能使监所外提讯所获供述具备法定证据效力,实现刑事诉讼的人权保障价值。The arraignment outside the prison is an important part of the investigation of the case.However,due to the substantive integration of the“resolving”and“arraigning”,the system deviation occurs.A primary measure of the evidence qualification of the defendant's confession outside the prison is to properly solve the value conflict between the investigation and evidence collection and the defendant right protection.The confession obtained outside the prison shall comply with the statutory evidentiary requirements,and shall follow the legal evidence-seeking path of the voluntary rules of confessions and the exclusion of illegal evidence.In the process of procedure construction,it is necessary to formulate a unified high-level code of conduct and a full implementation of the entire recording and video recording system.Only in this way can the confession obtained outside the prison be legally valid,realizing the human rights protection value of criminal proceedings.

关 键 词：监所外提讯 被告人供述 证据资格 程序构建 

分 类 号：DF7[政治法律—诉讼法学]