无名的天下:《诗经·黍离》中的春秋微言  

The Nameless Tianxia: A Reading of “Shu Li” in Book of Poetry

作　　者：柯小刚[1] KE Xiao-gang(School of Humanities,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China)

机构地区：[1]同济大学人文学院,上海200092

出　　处：《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第5期46-51,共6页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：对《诗经·王风》诸篇不编入“雅”而编其为“风”的现象,历来都有不同的解释。若沿着“家国天下的关系”这一思想线索,就会发现《王风》诸篇恰好处在一个行将变革的时代转折点,不仅家国天下之间的关联在松动,国之为国的本义以及国所负有的天下之义也已然丧失。而《春秋》有着与《王风》相似的历史处境。在这个意义上,《诗》之降王为风,《春秋》之借始于文王正月,皆是出于天下之义的问题意识。进而可知,《黍离》作为《王风》首篇,诗中所忧、所思同样不离天下之义的存废这个核心。细读《黍离》一诗,可以帮助我们理解晚周变革中的国与天下的关系,以及《诗》与《春秋》的政治哲学关联。According to the ideological clue of the relationship between family,state and Tianxia,it can be found that Odes of Wang was produced exactly at the turning point of a social transformation phase in which the relationship between family,state and Tianxia was getting looser and the original sense of“state”as well as its significance to Tianxia had also vanished.Spring and Autumn was produced in a similar historical circumstance as Odes of Wang.As such,Book of Poetry and Spring and Autumn both realized the problem related to the meaning of Tianxia,which was fully reflected in their content.Therefore,it can be concluded that“Shu Li”,the first ode in Odes of Wang,also concerned about the existence or abolition of the meaning of Tianxia.A careful reading of the ode“Shu li”can help understand the relationship between state and Tianxia in the transformation in the late Zhou Dynasty as well as the political and philosophical connection between Book of Poetry and Spring and Autumn.

关 键 词：《诗经》 《黍离》 天下 《春秋》 

分 类 号：B222[哲学宗教—中国哲学]