被告撤诉同意权的独立性塑造与实质性建构  

Independence Shaping and Substantive Construction of Defendant’s Consent Right to Withdraw Charge

作　　者：唐玉富[1] TANG Yufu

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学法学院

出　　处：《法学评论》2020年第5期90-100,共11页Law Review

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金第61批面上一等资助项目《引入协同治理理论重构民事撤诉制度研究》(项目编号:2017M610240);2017年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般课题《检察机关提起民事公益诉讼的法律地位及运作程序研究》(项目编号:GJ2017C26)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：被告撤诉同意权透过独立性权利和实质性权利的形态来实现增进诉讼两造实质平等和加强当事人程序保障的效能。然而,被告撤诉同意权在我国却是一种受到法院裁量权规制的非独立性权利,亦是被人为割裂为片面的、有限度的实质性权利。在变革民事撤诉过程中应将被告撤诉同意权构筑为不受法院权力强制干预的独立性权利,将法院权力从实质控制权改造为以形式审查权与阐明权的主要表现形式的程序控制权。同时,应当认真对待被告撤诉同意权,既要构筑精细的权利保障机制确保被告撤诉同意权具有独立支配撤诉效果的实质性,又要运用多种手段督促法院真正接受和利用被告撤诉同意权。The defendant’s consent right in civil dismissal is an independent and substantive right in civil litigation,which has the promotion of substantial equality and parties’ procedure protection. However,the right presents as a non-independent characteristics subject to the discretion of the court in our country. But also,the right has been artificially fragmented as a one-sided,limited substantive rights. It is an important thing that defendant’s consent right in civil dismissal should be an independent right free from the power of the court in the process of reforming the civil dismissal. We should change the discretion of court from substantive control power into procedural control power. The formal examination right and clarification right are the two main manifestations of the procedural control powers in the future. At the same time,we should take seriously the defendant’s consent right. On the one hand,it is necessary to construct an exquisite right protection mechanism to make the right have the independent control power over the effects of the withdrawal. On the other hand,we should urge the court to accept and use the defendant’s consent right by many means.

关 键 词：被告撤诉同意权 独立性 实质性 法院裁量权 撤诉 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]