体育经纪合同的“兼容”与“平衡”——对“邹市明案”的法学与经济学思考  

“Compatibility”and“Balance”of Sports Brokerage Contract:Reflections on the Law and Economics of Zou Shiming's Case

作　　者：张若晨 魏子华 钟薇[1] Zhang Ruochen;Wei Zihua;Zhong Wei(School of Management,Beijing Sports University,Beijing 100084,China;School of Law,Beijing Technology and Business University,Bei-jing 100048,China)

机构地区：[1]北京体育大学管理学院,北京100048 [2]北京工商大学法学院,北京100048

出　　处：《天津体育学院学报》2020年第5期594-598,共5页Journal of Tianjin University of Sport

摘　　要：体育经纪合同是对运动员人力资本产权进行投资处分的载体,实践中,体育市场投资者与运动员通过体育经纪合同确定权利义务。但是,由于人力资本产权并非法学概念,造成学界对此类合同法律性质上的认定发生混淆,导致投资者与运动员间利益冲突时所适用的合同规则不明,阻碍社会资本向体育产业流动,不利于体育经纪产业发展。通过厘清经纪合同的法律性质,构建其与人力资本产权理论相“兼容”的法律基础,并以美国拳击产业为例,结合美国《阿里法案》《职业拳击安全法案》,进一步将人力资本产权理论转化为法学意义上的具体合同规则与原则,同时辅之以相关法律法规进行细化。The sports brokerage contract is a carrier for investigating the human capital property rights of athletes.In practice,sports market investors and athletes determine their rights and obligations through sports brokerage contracts.However,because the concept of human capital property rights is not a legal concept,the academic circles have confused the legal nature of such contracts,resulting in unclear contract rules applicable to conflicts of interest between investors and athletes,hindering the flow of social capital to the sports industry,which is not conducive to sports and the development of the brokerage industry.This paper established the legal basis of“compatibility with human capital property rights theory”by clarifying the legal nature of the brokerage contract.Take the American boxing industry as an example,combined with the US Ali Act and Professional Boxing Security Act,further transform the human capital property right into specific contract rules and principles in the legal sense,and supplemented by relevant laws and regulations to refine.

关 键 词：体育经纪合同 新制度经济学 人力资本产权 合同法 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]