中西教育援助政策话语与客观实践一致性的比较——对西方学者质疑我国教育援助政治性的回应  

A comparison of the consistency between Chinese and western educational aid policy discourse and practice:a response to western scholars’query on“the political”of China’s educational aid

作　　者：任莺 万秀兰[2] REN Ying;WAN Xiulan(College of Nationalities,Lishui University,Lishui 323000,China;College of Teacher Education,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004,China)

机构地区：[1]丽水学院民族学院,浙江丽水323000 [2]浙江师范大学教师教育学院,浙江金华321004

出　　处：《浙江师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第5期109-117,共9页Journal of Zhejiang Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“美、英、日、印四国政府对非教育援助模式的比较研究”(18NDJC261YB)。

摘　　要：西方的教育援助不可能没有利己的政治目的,其实践与“自主权”“共识”“伙伴关系”等所谓“后政治”的政策话语相距甚远、无法一致,说明西方国际教育援助的“后政治时代”话语的虚伪性。而中国的对外教育援助基于人类命运共同体理念,一贯强调互利共赢原则,不标榜所谓“后政治”取向,不必也从未否认自身合乎国际关系准则的政治性,中国教育援助的实际行动与政策话语高度一致。所以引发克努森和林德伯格质疑的西方教育援助政策话语体系,根本不适用于对中国教育援助的解释。It is impossible for western educational aid to have no self-interest political purpose.In fact,its practice is far from the so-called“post-politics”discourse,such as“autonomy”,“consensus”and“partnership”,which shows the hypocrisy of the discourse of“post-politics era”of western international educational aid.Chinese foreign educational aid is based on the concept of a community of shared future for mankind.It always emphasizes the principle of mutual benefit and win-win results,does not flaunt the so-called“post political”orientation,and does not have to and has never denied its political nature in line with the norms of international relations.The actual practice of Chinese educational aid is highly consistent with the policy discourse.Therefore,the discourse system of western educational aid policy,which arouses the doubts of Knutsson and Lindberg,is not applicable to the interpretation of Chinese educational aid at all.

关 键 词：后政治 中国教育援助 非洲 西方援助 

分 类 号：G40-059.3[文化科学—教育学原理]