检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭鸿杰 张达球 GUO Hongjie;ZHANG Daqiu(School of Foreign Studies,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433,China)
出 处:《外语教学与研究》2020年第5期674-687,799,共15页Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基 金:上海财经大学通识教育课程项目“全球化英语”(2020120082)成果。
摘 要:本研究采用变异语言学理论,分析了在逻辑主语为复数的语境下,英语存在句主谓非一致变异模式及其制约因素。基于语料库的研究结果显示,在伦敦和渥太华两个英语地域变体中,主谓非一致存在句是一种常态,there’s使用频率最高,there was位居其次,但使用更稳定,历史更悠久。多变量分析结果显示,存在句语法变异的显著制约因素包括时态、地域、限定词、极性及辨识距离。此外,尽管存在句主谓非一致结构的使用频率存在差异,但其底层语法机制基本一致。该结果证明了存在句主谓非一致是一种有序而系统的语法变异。Within the variationist paradigm,this study attempts to explore the patterns of English existential sentences with plural subjects and the factors contributing to the variation in subject-verb non-agreement.The corpus-based research findings disclose an overwhelming preference for nonconcord existentials,and there’s has become a norm among the existential sentences.Secondary to there’s,there was enjoys a more stable status in the diachronic development.A multivariate analysis reveals that remarkable constraining factors of grammatical variation in existential sentences include tense,region,determiner,polarity and cue distance.The study also showcases a similar deep grammatical mechanism between different non-concord forms despite the discrepancy in their frequency,which evidences that non-concord turns out to be an orderly and systematic grammatical variation in existentials.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46