检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙姣 钟妮 毛晋平[1] SUN Jiao;ZHONG Ni;MAO Jinping(School of Educational Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)
出 处:《心理技术与应用》2020年第11期663-670,共8页Psychology(Techniques and Applications)
基 金:湖南省社科基金2018重点项目(中学生领导力发展影响因素研究:基于青少年积极发展资源模型;项目编号:18ZDB027)。
摘 要:基于积极青少年发展理论,使用青少年意向性自我调节量表调查湖南1044名初高中生,以探究我国青少年的意向性自我调节发展特点。结果表明,青少年意向性自我调节各策略之间差异显著,补偿>损失性选择>优化>选择性选择;青少年意向性自我调节有学段差异,高中得分高于初中;在损失性选择策略上有年级、性别差异,初二得分低于高中各年级,女生得分高于男生;普通类高中与示范类高中学生意向性自我调节在选择性选择、补偿两策略上差异显著。这说明,青少年意向性自我调节存有学段、性别、学校类型上的差异。Based on the theory of positive adolescent development,a survey of 1044 junior and senior high school students in Hunan was conducted with the intentional self-regulation scale to explore the development characteristics of intentional self-regulation among adolescents in China.The results showed that there are differences in the scores of adolescents'intentional self-regulation strategies,from high to low,they are compensation,loss-based selection,optimization and selective choice.The scores of high school students were higher than that of middle school students.There were grade and gender differences in the loss-making selection strategies.The score of junior two was lower than that of senior high school,and the score of female students was higher than that of male students.There is a significant difference in the two strategies of selective selection and compensation between the ordinary high school and the demonstration high school.These results show that the intentional self-regulation of adolescents has differences in school segment,gender and school type.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.233